Field Value Correction Note |
12 |
|
2 |
Burgess | Veinnie |
F |
|
Granddaughter |
S |
Apr 21 |
1892 |
8 |
On line 12,
the value for the givens
field is "Veinnie",
the suggested correction is "Jennie". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: As enumerated. He used an Old Hands Law Scripted J. Yes, it resembles V but is not one. Aileen
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
15 |
|
3 |
McDonald | T Eachy |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 16 |
1844 |
56 |
On line 15,
the value for the givens
field is "T Eachy",
the suggested correction is "Teachy". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Enumerator used an English Script small "e" which looks like a modern capital E.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
16 |
|
3 |
McDonald | Winnie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 20 |
1876 |
24 |
On line 16,
the value for the givens
field is "Winnie",
the suggested correction is "Minnie".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
28 |
|
6 |
Robertson | Laura W |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 21 |
1891 |
9 |
On line 28,
the value for the givens
field is "Laura W",
the suggested correction is "Laura M". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Compare with M in Martha Line 31.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
28 |
|
6 |
Robertson | Laura W |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 21 |
1891 |
9 |
On line 28,
the value for the givens
field is "Laura W",
the suggested correction is "Laura M".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
31 |
|
6 |
Robertson | Martha W |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 19 |
1898 |
2 |
On line 31,
the value for the givens
field is "Martha W",
the suggested correction is "Martha M". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Compare with M in Martha!
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
31 |
|
6 |
Robertson | Martha W |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 19 |
1898 |
2 |
On line 31,
the value for the givens
field is "Martha W",
the suggested correction is "Martha M".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
34 |
|
7 |
Robertson | Elizabeth H |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 23 |
1870 |
31 |
On line 34,
the value for the givens
field is "Elizabeth H",
the suggested correction is "Elizabeth J". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: As enumerated.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
34 |
|
7 |
Robertson | Elizabeth H |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 23 |
1870 |
31 |
On line 34,
the value for the givens
field is "Elizabeth H",
the suggested correction is "Elizabeth J".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
34 |
|
7 |
Robertson | Elizabeth H |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 23 |
1870 |
31 |
On line 34,
the value for the givens
field is "Elizabeth H",
the suggested correction is "Elizabeth J". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: Clearly is a J. for Jane as per Marriage # 011826-94, Victoria Co., On.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
38 |
|
7 |
Robertson | Martha W |
F |
|
Sister |
S |
Mar 2 |
1861 |
39 |
On line 38,
the value for the givens
field is "Martha W",
the suggested correction is "Martha M".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
38 |
|
7 |
Robertson | Martha W |
F |
|
Sister |
S |
Mar 2 |
1861 |
39 |
On line 38,
the value for the month
field is "Mar",
the suggested correction is "May". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: As enumerated.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
38 |
|
7 |
Robertson | Martha W |
F |
|
Sister |
S |
Mar 2 |
1861 |
39 |
On line 38,
the value for the givens
field is "Martha W",
the suggested correction is "Martha M". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Compare with Martha on Line 31.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
43 |
|
8 |
Lewis | Naveria P |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 31 |
1878 |
22 |
On line 43,
the value for the givens
field is "Naveria P",
the suggested correction is "Francais P". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: As entered by enumerator, the1st letter is actually a combination="Fr" once isolated, the rest are easier to define.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
46 |
|
9 |
Burgess | Annie W |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 15 |
1877 |
23 |
On line 46,
the value for the givens
field is "Annie W",
the suggested correction is "Annie M". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Compare with Martha Line 31.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
46 |
|
9 |
Burgess | Annie W |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 15 |
1877 |
23 |
On line 46,
the value for the givens
field is "Annie W",
the suggested correction is "Annie M".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
48 |
|
9 |
Burgess | Jane L |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 19 |
1895 |
5 |
On line 48,
the value for the givens
field is "Jane L",
the suggested correction is "Jane E". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: Janie Elizabeth Burgess
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
49 |
|
9 |
Burgess | Burwell W |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 12 |
1898 |
2 |
On line 49,
the value for the givens
field is "Burwell W",
the suggested correction is "Burwell M". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Compare with Martha Line 31.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
49 |
|
9 |
Burgess | Burwell W |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 12 |
1898 |
2 |
On line 49,
the value for the givens
field is "Burwell W",
the suggested correction is "Burwell M".
|
|