Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		1	Maxwell William	M		Lodger with no. 3	S	Sep 1	1879	22
2		1	Brewster James Howard	M		Lodger with no. 3	S	Mar 6	1878	23
3		1	Clemes Art	M		Head	M	Nov 13	1851	49
4		1	Clemes Esther	F		Wife	M	Oct 8	1851	49
5		1	Oppenheim Helen	F		Domestic	S	Jul 22	1881	19
6		1	Oppenheim Rachel	F		Domestic	S	May 17	1874	26
7		1	Clemes Henry	M		Brother & Lodger	W	not known		40
8		1	Inskip Forrester Cecil	M		Lodger & Employee	S	Feb 3	1877	24
9		1	Nylander Hans	M		Lodger & Employee	S	May 19	1853	47
10		1	Clark Walter	M		Lodger & Employee	M	Apr 9	1867	33
11		1	Donnelly James	M		Employee	S	Jun 3	1858	42
12		1	Clapperton Sandy	M			M	not known	1869	32
13		2	Inskip Percy Charles	M			S	Jun 4	1874	26
14		3	Negrean(?) John	M		Head	M	Jun 13		41
15		3	Negrean(?) Clara	F		Wife	M	May 3		25
16		3	Negrean(?) John	M		Son	S	Dec 10		9
17		3	Negrean(?) Clara	F		Daughter	S	Mar 18	1894	7
18		3	Negrean(?) Matilda	F		Daughter	S	Nov 21	1896	4
19		3	Negrean(?) Robert	M		Son	S	Feb 23	1899	2
20		4	Ghlighemken(?) John	M			M	not known	abt.	47
21		5	Hans William	M			M	not known	1864	36
22		6	Gaudern Wm	M			S	Feb 23	1877	24
23		7	Smith John	M		Head	M	Aug 17	1852	48
24		7	Smith Jessie Ann	F		Wife	M	Jul 17	1853	47	01
25		7	Smith Jessie A.	F		Daughter	S	Jan 22	1885	16
26		7	Smith John Wm	M		Son	S	Oct 13	1886	14
27		7	Smith Isabella	F		Daughter	S	Mar 10	1889	12
28		7	Smith Jemima	F		Daughter	S	Apr 23	1891	9
29		7	Smith Frank	M		Son	S	Jul 16	1893	7
30		7	Smith Margaret C.	F		Daughter	S	Sep 13	1895	5
31		7	Smith Alice J.	F		Daughter	S	Aug 2	1898	2
32		7	Smith William	M		Brother & Employee	S	Aug 17	1850	50
33		8	MacKay Jane	F		Sister in Law	W	Apr 29	185?	44
34		8	MacKay Mary	F		daughter of no. 10	S	Jul 14	1890	10
35		8	MacKay Jemima	F		daughter of no. 10	S	Jul 6	1892	8
36		8	MacKay Malcolm	M		son of no. 10	S	May 26	1895	5
37		8	Fleming Robert W.	M		Lodger & Employee of no. 9	S	Nov 17	1880	20	01
38		8	Nselkapesket(?) Thomas	M		Lodger & Employee of no. 9	S	not known	abt.	22
39		8	Nltekatem(?) Wal?	M		Lodger & Employee of no. 9	S	not known	abt.	19
40		8	Lee Mong (Jack)	M		Lodger & Employee of no. 9	S	not known	abt.	60
41		9	Tom Seng (Charles)	M		Head	S	Aug		61
42		9	Ching Oen	M		Employee of ???	M	May		34
43		9	Chong Eeng Ho	M		Lodger	M	Nov		38
44		9	Ah Joe	M		Employee of no. 11	S	May		23
45		10	Mak A Loy	M			S	not known	about	40
46		10	Chang Foy	M			S	not known	about	45
47		10	Ma Sek Kon	M			S	uncertain	about	45
48		10	Loh(?) Hang	M			S	uncertain	about	55
49		10	Vi???a Robert	M		Nephew of lines 5 & 6(?)	S	Jun 15	1898	3
50		10	Vicoena(?) Ruby	F		Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?)	S	Mar 9	1899	2

Line Notes On This Page

The following note applies to line 6:

'Rachel is the mother of Ruby on line 50'

The following note applies to line 23:

'family no. 9 (crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 33:

'no. 10 was entered in "family" field, but was crossed out'

The following note applies to line 34:

'daughter of no. 10 probably refers to Jane MacKay (family no.10, crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 35:

'"daughter of no. 10" probably refers to Jane MacKay (family no.10, crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 36:

'"son of no. 10" probably refers to Jane MacKay (family no.10, crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 37:

'"Lodger and Employee of no. 9" probably refers to John Smith (family no. 9, crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 38:

'"Lodger and Employee of no. 9" probably refers to John Smith (family no. 9, crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 39:

'"Lodger and Employee of no. 9" probably refers to John Smith (family no. 9, crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 40:

'"Lodger and Employee of no. 9" probably refers to John Smith (family no. 9, crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 41:

'family no. 11 (crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 44:

'"Employee of no. 11" probably refers to Tom Seng (Charles) (family no. 11, crossed out)'

The following note applies to line 50:

'another surname (illegible) is written on the line, but Vienna is written below'

The following note applies to line 50:

'surname Vicoena(?) or Vienna(?) or something else???'

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
1		1	Maxwell	William	M		Lodger with no. 3	S	Sep 1	1879	22
On line 1, the value for the household field is "1", the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner. The following comment was attached: Household number is crossed out.
Field Value Correction Note
2		1	Brewster	James Howard	M		Lodger with no. 3	S	Mar 6	1878	23
On line 2, the value for the household field is "1", the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner. The following comment was attached: Household number is crossed out.
Field Value Correction Note
14		3	Negrean(?)	John	M		Head	M	Jun 13		41
On line 14, the value for the surname field is "Negrean(?)", the suggested correction is "Negrean". The following comment was attached: There are these Negrean records in Vital Event indexes, BC Archives.
Field Value Correction Note
14		3	Negrean(?)	John	M		Head	M	Jun 13		41
On line 14, the value for the surname field is "Negrean(?)", the suggested correction is "Negtean". Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
Field Value Correction Note
22		6	Gaudern	Wm	M			S	Feb 23	1877	24
On line 22, the value for the givens field is "Wm", the suggested correction is "William".
Field Value Correction Note
37		8	Fleming	Robert W.	M		Lodger & Employee of no. 9	S	Nov 17	1880	20
On line 37, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Lodger ", the suggested correction is "Lodger of no. 9". Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
Field Value Correction Note
38		8	Nselkapesket(?)	Thomas	M		Lodger & Employee of no. 9	S	Other: not known	abt.	22
On line 38, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Lodger ", the suggested correction is "Employee of no. 9". Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
Field Value Correction Note
39		8	Nltekatem(?)	Wal?	M		Lodger & Employee of no. 9	S	Other: not known	abt.	19
On line 39, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Lodger ", the suggested correction is "Employee no. 9". Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
Field Value Correction Note
39		8	Nltekatem(?)	Wal?	M		Lodger & Employee of no. 9	S	Other: not known	abt.	19
On line 39, the value for the givens field is "Wal?", the suggested correction is "Walter".
Field Value Correction Note
40		8	Lee	Mong (Jack)	M		Lodger & Employee of no. 9	S	Other: not known	abt.	60
On line 40, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Lodger ", the suggested correction is "Employee no. 9". Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
Field Value Correction Note
49		10	Vi???a	Robert	M		Nephew of lines 5 & 6(?)	S	Jun 15	1898	3
On line 49, the value for the surname field is "Vi???a", the suggested correction is "Vienna".
Field Value Correction Note
49		10	Vi???a	Robert	M		Nephew of lines 5 & 6(?)	S	Jun 15	1898	3
On line 49, the value for the surname field is "Vi???a", the suggested correction is "Vienna".
Field Value Correction Note
49		10	Vi???a	Robert	M		Nephew of lines 5 & 6(?)	S	Jun 15	1898	3
On line 49, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Nephew of lines 5 ", the suggested correction is "Nephew of lines 5 & 6 ". The following comment was attached: Nephew of Helen and Rachel Oppenheim
Field Value Correction Note
50		10	Vicoena(?)	Ruby	F		Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?)	S	Mar 9	1899	2
On line 50, the value for the surname field is "Vicoena(?)", the suggested correction is "Oppenheim ". The following comment was attached: I just got Ruby's marriage & death records, and she is the daughter of Rachel Oppenheim; if one looks at the actual document, one can see Oppenheim written just before Ruby's name
Field Value Correction Note
50		10	Vicoena(?)	Ruby	F		Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?)	S	Mar 9	1899	2
On line 50, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Niece of line 5 ", the suggested correction is "Niece of line 5 & 6 & Family 1". The following comment was attached: I take this to mean Family 1 at the top of page, niece of Helen & Rachel Oppenheim
Field Value Correction Note
50		10	Vicoena(?)	Ruby	F		Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?)	S	Mar 9	1899	2
On line 50, the value for the surname field is "Vicoena(?)", the suggested correction is "Vienna Oppenheim". The following comment was attached: Look closely to see Vienna
Field Value Correction Note
50		10	Vicoena(?)	Ruby	F		Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?)	S	Mar 9	1899	2
On line 50, the value for the surname field is "Vicoena(?)", the suggested correction is "Vienna Oppenheim". The following comment was attached: This is Ruby Oppenheim, niece of Helen & Rachel Oppenheim of Lines 5 & 6

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: l-7 District: YALE & CARIBOO National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com