Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
|
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Angus James | M | Head | M | Sep 28 | 1867 |
|
01* | ||||
2 | 1 | Angus Margaret | F | Wife | M | Mar | 1868 |
|
01* | ||||
3 | 1 | Angus Ethell | F | Daughter | S | Jun 24 | 1893 |
|
01* | ||||
4 | 1 | Angus Margaret | F | Daughter | S | 1894 |
|
01* | |||||
5 | 1 | Angus Lena | F | Daughter | S | 1896 |
|
01* | |||||
6 | 1 | Angus William | M | Son | S | 1899 |
|
01* | |||||
7 | 2 | Beay? ? | M | Head | M | 1858 |
|
01* | |||||
8 | 2 | Beay? Jennet | F | Wife | M |
|
01* | ||||||
9 | 2 | Beay? Nelley | F | Daughter | S |
|
01* | ||||||
10 | 2 | Beay? Sarah | F | Daughter | S |
|
01* | ||||||
11 | 2 | Beay? Jessie | F | Daughter | S |
|
|||||||
12 | 2 | Beay? Thomas | M | Son | S | Mar | 1900 |
|
|||||
13 | 2 | Mickel Abraham | M | Servant | S |
|
|||||||
14 | 3 | Angus William | M | Head | S | Feb 28 | 1876 |
|
01* | ||||
15 | 3 | Angus Robert | M | S | 1876 |
|
01* | ||||||
16 | 4 | Angus Alex | M | Head | S | Aug 15 | 1830 |
|
|||||
17 | 5 | Chalmers Archie | M | Head | M | Mar 15 | 1865 |
|
|||||
18 | 5 | Chalmers Rebecca | F | Wife | M | Mar 23 | 1876 |
|
01* | ||||
19 | 5 | Chalmers John | M | Son | S | Sep 6 | 1896 |
|
|||||
20 | 6 | Lorimer JAmes | M | Head | M | Nov 7 | 1855 |
|
01* | ||||
21 | 6 | Lorimer Mary | F | Wife | M | Mar 26 | 1863 |
|
01* | ||||
22 | 6 | Lorimer Lu?cy | F | Daughter | S | Jan 20 | 1887 |
|
01* | ||||
23 | 6 | Lorimer William | M | Son | S | Dec 13 | 1888 |
|
0* | ||||
24 | 6 | Lorimer Marey | F | Daughter | S | May 11 | 1890 |
|
01 | ||||
25 | 6 | Lorimer Jane | F | Daughter | S | Aug 21 | 1894 |
|
01* | ||||
26 | 6 | Lorimer Hubert | M | Son | S | Jul 4 | 1896 |
|
01** | ||||
27 | 6 | Lorimer Mamie | F | Daughter | S | May 11 | 1898 |
|
|||||
28 | 6 | Lorimer James | M | Son | S | May 11 | 1898 |
|
|||||
29 | 6 | Lorimer Allen | M | Son | S | Jun 3 | 1900 |
|
01* | ||||
30 | 7 | Luth George | M | Head | M | Mar 7 | 1850 |
|
01* | ||||
31 | 7 | Luth Margaret | F | Wife | M | Aug 20 | 1853 |
|
01* | ||||
32 | 7 | Luth John | M | Son | S | Jul 2 | 1877 |
|
|||||
33 | 7 | Luth Rachell | F | Daughter | S | Sep 1 | 1886 |
|
|||||
34 | 7 | Luth Elizebeth | F | Daughter | S | Aug 5 | 1884 |
|
01* | ||||
35 | 7 | Luth William | M | Son | S | Oct 22 | 1881 |
|
0* | ||||
36 | 7 | Luth George? | M | Son | S | Oct 22 | 1886 |
|
01* | ||||
37 | 8 | Luth William | M | Head | S | May 11 | 1854 |
|
|||||
38 | 9 | Luth John A | M | Head | S | Jul 2 | 1877 |
|
|||||
39 | 10 | Angus William | M | Head | M | Mar 14 | 18?5 |
|
01* | ||||
40 | 10 | Angus Elisebeth | F | Wife | M | Mar 13 | 1860 |
|
01* | ||||
41 | 10 | Angus Ale?? | M | Son | S | May 16 | 1887 |
|
01* | ||||
42 | 10 | Angus Jane | F | Daughter | S | Nov 3 | 1889 |
|
|||||
43 | 10 | Angus Elizebeth | F | Daughter | S | Jun 6 | 1890 |
|
01 | ||||
44 | 10 | Angus Margret | F | Daughter | S | Jun 8 |
|
0* | |||||
45 | 10 | Angus Elsie | F | Daughter | S | Mar | 1893 |
|
01* | ||||
46 | 10 | Angus Bessie | F | Daughter | S | Apr 23 | 1895 |
|
01* | ||||
47 | 10 | Angus Grace | F | Daughter | S | Dec 4 | 1897 |
|
01* | ||||
48 | 10 | Angus Elisebeth | F | Mother | W | Dec 29 | 182? |
|
|||||
49 | 11 | Ingram Gery? | M | Head | S | Dec 29 | 1849 |
|
01* | ||||
50 |
|
The following note applies to line 33:
'Birthdate (1886) and age (18) as recorded do not match.' |
The following note applies to line 35:
'William and George appear to be twins - both with age 14 - so date of William's birth is probably 1886.' |
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
7 | 2 | Beay? | ? | M | Head | M | 1858 | 42 | |||
On line 7,
the value for the givens
field is "?",
the suggested correction is "John". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
7 | 2 | Beay? | ? | M | Head | M | 1858 | 42 | |||
On line 7,
the value for the surname
field is "Beay?",
the suggested correction is "Bray". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
34 | 7 | Luth | Elizebeth | F | Daughter | S | Aug 5 | 1884 | 16 | ||
On line 34,
the value for the surname
field is "Luth",
the suggested correction is "Leith". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: this is my grandmother | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
38 | 9 | Luth | John A | M | Head | S | Jul 2 | 1877 | 24 | ||
On line 38,
the value for the month
field is "Jul",
the suggested correction is "Feb". Submitted by Gail Gauthier. The following comment was attached: I believe it is an F rather than J on the month | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
39 | 10 | Angus | William | M | Head | M | Mar 14 | 18?5 | 46 | ||
On line 39,
the value for the year
field is "18?5",
the suggested correction is "1855". Submitted by Gail Gauthier. The following comment was attached: Likely 1855 as that provides the correct age | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
48 | 10 | Angus | Elisebeth | F | Mother | W | Dec 29 | 182? | 78 | ||
On line 48,
the value for the year
field is "182?",
the suggested correction is "1824". Submitted by Gail Gauthier. The following comment was attached: I believe that is what the enumerator attempted to write. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
49 | 11 | Ingram | Gery? | M | Head | S | Dec 29 | 1849 | 51 | ||
On line 49,
the value for the givens
field is "Gery?",
the suggested correction is "George". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: might be abbreviated form, but his name is George | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
49 | 11 | Ingram | Gery? | M | Head | S | Dec 29 | 1849 | 51 | ||
On line 49,
the value for the givens
field is "Gery?",
the suggested correction is "George". Submitted by Gail Gauthier. The following comment was attached: Possibly more likely than Gery. | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: i-1 District: Marquette National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com