| Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
| |||||||||||||||
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
| L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
| H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
1 | Armstrong Robert | M | Head | M | Jan 29 | 1861 |
|
01* | ||||
| 2 | 1 | Armstrong Sarah | F | Wife | M | Feb 14 | 1871 |
|
01 | ||||
| 3 | 1 | Armstrong John | M | Son | S | Oct 25 | 1883 |
|
01 | ||||
4 |
1 | Armstrong Herbert | M | Son | S | May 15 | 1886 |
|
|||||
| 5 | 1 | Armstrong Anna May | F | Daughter | S | Aug 21 | 1889 |
|
|||||
6 |
1 | Armstrong ??l Cora | F | Daughter | S | Mar 1 | 1891 |
|
01 | ||||
| 7 | 1 | Armstrong Alma Mary | F | Daughter | S | Sep 13 | 1895 |
|
01 | ||||
8 |
1 | Gossling(?) Isabella | F | Domestic | S | Apr 10 | 1877 |
|
|||||
9 |
2 | Johnston I. Andrew | M | Head | M | May 20 | 1854 |
|
01 | ||||
| 10 | 2 | Johnston T(?) Mary | F | Wife | M | ? 25 | 1859 |
|
01 | ||||
| 11 | 2 | Johnston May Elizabeth | F | Daughter | S | Nov 2 | 1881 |
|
|||||
| 12 | 2 | Johnston Andrew John | M | Son | S | Dec 7 | 1884 |
|
01 | ||||
| 13 | 2 | Johnston D. Sarah | F | Daughter | S | Apr 24 | 1887 |
|
01 | ||||
| 14 | 2 | Johnston L. James | M | Son | S | Jun 4 | 1889 |
|
01 | ||||
| 15 | 2 | Johnston D. Arthur | M | Son | S | Mar 8 | 1891 |
|
01 | ||||
16 |
2 | Johnston M. Margaret | F | Daughter | S | Apr 30 | 1893 |
|
01 | ||||
| 17 | 2 | Johnston E. George | M | Son | S | Sep 14 | 1895 |
|
01 | ||||
| 18 | 2 | Johnston I. Mabel | F | Daughter | S | Jul 20 | 1897 |
|
01 | ||||
| 19 | 2 | Johnston A. Betrice | F | Daughter | S | Jan 20 | 1899 |
|
01 | ||||
| 20 | 2 | Bates Thomas | M | Labourer | S | Apr 1 | 1879 |
|
001 | ||||
21 |
3 | Buic John | M | Head | M | Jan 1 | 1860 |
|
|||||
22 |
3 | Buic Elizabeth | F | Wife | M | Dec 9 | 1861 |
|
|||||
23 |
3 | Buic Sadie | F | Daughter | S | Mar 28 | 1887 |
|
|||||
24 |
3 | Buic Willie | M | Son | S | Nov 8 | 1889 |
|
|||||
25 |
3 | Buic Fredrick | M | ? | S | Oct 24 | 1890 |
|
|||||
26 |
3 | Buic Charles | M | Son | S | May 25 | 1898 |
|
|||||
27 |
4 | Roe Thomas | M | Head | M | May 22 | 1866 |
|
01 | ||||
28 |
4 | Roe Nellie | F | Wife | M | Jul 5 | 1871 |
|
01 | ||||
29 |
4 | Roe May Gertie | F | Daughter | S | Dec 5 | 1892 |
|
|||||
30 |
4 | Roe Osker | M | Son | S | Dec 17 | 1894 |
|
01 | ||||
31 |
4 | Roe Edna | F | Daughter | S | Feb 7 | 1898 |
|
01 | ||||
32 |
4 | Roe Frank | M | Son | S | Jun 12 | 1900 |
|
01 | ||||
33 |
5 | Moosett(?) William | M | Head | M | Apr 25 | 1862 |
|
01 | ||||
| 34 | 5 | Moosett(?) E. Jenette(?) | F | Wife | M | Jul 12 | 1873 |
|
01 | ||||
| 35 | 5 | Moosett(?) ?. Archubald(?) | M | Son | S | Apr 27 | 1900 |
|
01 | ||||
36 |
6 | Bown(?) P. William | M | Head | M | Nov 14 | 1862 |
|
01 | ||||
| 37 | 6 | Bown(?) Anne | F | Wife | M | Dec 7 | 1865 |
|
01 | ||||
| 38 | 6 | Bown(?) M. Laura | F | Daughter | S | Sep 9 | 1888 |
|
01 | ||||
| 39 | 6 | Bown(?) A. Stephen | M | Son | S | Jan 3 | 1891 |
|
01 | ||||
40 |
6 | Bown(?) ?. Norman | M | Son | S | Jul 7 | 1893 |
|
01 | ||||
| 41 | 6 | Bown(?) A. William | M | Son | S | Mar 7 | 1895 |
|
01 | ||||
| 42 | 6 | Bown(?) S. Walter | M | Son | S | May 6 | 1897 |
|
01 | ||||
43 |
6 | Bown(?) ?. James | M | Son | S | May 21 | 1899 |
|
01 | ||||
44 |
6 | Baun? Blakly(?) | M | Labourer | S | Jun 22 | 1878 |
|
|||||
45 |
7 | Buic Donald | M | Head | M | Sep 9 | 1869 |
|
01 | ||||
46 |
7 | Buic K. Emma | F | Wife | M | Jul 17 | 1872 |
|
01 | ||||
47 |
7 | Buic Gordon | M | Son | S | Jul 13 | 1900 |
|
01 | ||||
| 48 |
|
||||||||||||
| 49 |
|
||||||||||||
| 50 |
|
||||||||||||
In household 3, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Buic',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Buie'.
In household 3, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Buic',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Buie'.
In household 3, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Buic',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Buie'.
In household 3, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Buic',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Buie'.
In household 3, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Buic',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Buie'.
In household 3, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Buic',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Buie'.
In household 3, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Buic',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Buie'.
In household 4, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Roe',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Rowe'.
The person suggesting the alternative surname provided this comment: 'Thomas Rowe is my Great-grandfather'.
In household 7, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Buic',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Buie'.
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | Armstrong | Robert | M | Head | M | Jan 29 | 1861 | 40 | ||
On line 1,
the value for the givens
field is "Robert",
the suggested correction is "Rob.". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. The following comment was attached: What it says, not what you think it should be. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 4 | 1 | Armstrong | Herbert | M | Son | S | May 15 | 1886 | 15 | ||
On line 4,
the value for the year
field is "1886",
the suggested correction is "1864". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. The following comment was attached: Obviously does not correspond to age, but... | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 6 | 1 | Armstrong | ??l Cora | F | Daughter | S | Mar 1 | 1891 | 10 | ||
On line 6,
the value for the givens
field is "??l Cora",
the suggested correction is "Perl Cora". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 8 | 1 | Gossling(?) | Isabella | F | Domestic | S | Apr 10 | 1877 | 24 | ||
On line 8,
the value for the surname
field is "Gossling(?)",
the suggested correction is "Gossling". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 9 | 2 | Johnston | I. Andrew | M | Head | M | May 20 | 1854 | 48 | ||
On line 9,
the value for the year
field is "1854",
the suggested correction is "1858". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 16 | 2 | Johnston | M. Margaret | F | Daughter | S | Apr 30 | 1893 | 8 | ||
On line 16,
the value for the givens
field is "M. Margaret",
the suggested correction is "M. Margret". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 21 | 3 | Buic | John | M | Head | M | Jan 1 | 1860 | 40 | ||
On line 21,
the value for the surname
field is "Buic",
the suggested correction is "Buie". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 25 | 3 | Buic | Fredrick | M | ? | S | Oct 24 | 1890 | 10 | ||
On line 25,
the value for the relationship
field is "?",
the suggested correction is "Daughter". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. The following comment was attached: Not likely, but it does say D. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 27 | 4 | Roe | Thomas | M | Head | M | May 22 | 1866 | 3? | ||
On line 27,
the value for the surname
field is "Roe",
the suggested correction is "Rowe". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by J Nathan: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 28 | 4 | Roe | Nellie | F | Wife | M | Jul 5 | 1871 | 30 | ||
On line 28,
the value for the surname
field is "Roe",
the suggested correction is "Rowe". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by J Nathan: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 29 | 4 | Roe | May Gertie | F | Daughter | S | Dec 5 | 1892 | 8 | ||
On line 29,
the value for the surname
field is "Roe",
the suggested correction is "Rowe". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by J Nathan: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 30 | 4 | Roe | Osker | M | Son | S | Dec 17 | 1894 | 6 | ||
On line 30,
the value for the givens
field is "Osker",
the suggested correction is "Oscar". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by J Nathan: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 30 | 4 | Roe | Osker | M | Son | S | Dec 17 | 1894 | 6 | ||
On line 30,
the value for the surname
field is "Roe",
the suggested correction is "Rowe". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by J Nathan: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 31 | 4 | Roe | Edna | F | Daughter | S | Feb 7 | 1898 | 3 | ||
On line 31,
the value for the surname
field is "Roe",
the suggested correction is "Rowe". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by J Nathan: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 32 | 4 | Roe | Frank | M | Son | S | Jun 12 | 1900 | ? months | ||
On line 32,
the value for the surname
field is "Roe",
the suggested correction is "Rowe". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by J Nathan: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 32 | 4 | Roe | Frank | M | Son | S | Jun 12 | 1900 | ? months | ||
On line 32,
the value for the age
field is "? months",
the suggested correction is "10 months". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 33 | 5 | Moosett(?) | William | M | Head | M | Apr 25 | 1862 | 38 | ||
On line 33,
the value for the surname
field is "Moosett(?)",
the suggested correction is "Moore". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 33 | 5 | Moosett(?) | William | M | Head | M | Apr 25 | 1862 | 38 | ||
On line 33,
the value for the givens
field is "William",
the suggested correction is "H. William". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 36 | 6 | Bown(?) | P. William | M | Head | M | Nov 14 | 1862 | 38 | ||
On line 36,
the value for the surname
field is "Bown(?)",
the suggested correction is "Rawn ?". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 40 | 6 | Bown(?) | ?. Norman | M | Son | S | Jul 7 | 1893 | 8 | ||
On line 40,
the value for the givens
field is "?. Norman",
the suggested correction is "E. Norman". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 40 | 6 | Bown(?) | ?. Norman | M | Son | S | Jul 7 | 1893 | 8 | ||
On line 40,
the value for the month
field is "Jul",
the suggested correction is "Feb". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 43 | 6 | Bown(?) | ?. James | M | Son | S | May 21 | 1899 | 2 | ||
On line 43,
the value for the givens
field is "?. James",
the suggested correction is "R. James". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 44 | 6 | Baun? | Blakly(?) | M | Labourer | S | Jun 22 | 1878 | 23 | ||
On line 44,
the value for the givens
field is "Blakly(?)",
the suggested correction is "S. Blakly(?)". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 45 | 7 | Buic | Donald | M | Head | M | Sep 9 | 1869 | 31 | ||
On line 45,
the value for the surname
field is "Buic",
the suggested correction is "Buie". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 46 | 7 | Buic | K. Emma | F | Wife | M | Jul 17 | 1872 | 28 | ||
On line 46,
the value for the month
field is "Jul",
the suggested correction is "Feb". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 47 | 7 | Buic | Gordon | M | Son | S | Jul 13 | 1900 | 1 | ||
On line 47,
the value for the month
field is "Jul",
the suggested correction is "Feb". Submitted by Judy van der Veen. | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: h-6 District: SIMCOE (North/Nord) National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com