Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
26 |
McGregor B Christina |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Aug 17 |
1899 |
1
|
|
|
01 |
|
26 |
McGregor A Donald |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Mar 14 |
1901 |
24/12?
|
|
|
01 |
|
27 |
Alguir Donald |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 15 |
1852 |
48
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Alguir Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 4 |
1857 |
44
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Alguir Gertie |
F |
|
Daughter |
M |
Aug 1 |
1881 |
20
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Alguir William |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 17 |
1883 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Alguir Ruth |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 15 |
1885 |
15
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Alguir Jessie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 19 |
1888 |
13
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Alguir Elsie |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 5 |
1890 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Alguir Tessie |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 10 |
1891 |
9
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Muatty? James |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
|
1841 |
60
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Cameron Donald |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 5 |
1842 |
59
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Cameron Eliza |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Sep |
1852 |
46
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Cameron P John |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 27 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Cameron J Robert |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Mar 7 |
1880 |
21
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Cameron A Janet |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 2 |
1883 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Cameron B Sarah |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 20 |
1885 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Cameron Alxine? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 2 |
1889 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
Grant James |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Nov 10 |
1830 |
70
|
|
|
01 |
|
29 |
Grant A Jane |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 18 |
1836 |
64
|
|
|
01 |
|
29 |
Grant J Donald |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 29 |
1868 |
33
|
|
|
01 |
|
29 |
Grant A Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 21 |
1871 |
30
|
|
|
01 |
|
29 |
Grant A William |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Nov 19 |
1894 |
7
|
|
|
01 |
|
29 |
Grant T Claracy? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 23 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
01 |
|
29 |
Grant C Stewart |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Nov 18 |
1900 |
4/12
|
|
|
01 |
|
29 |
McDermid Albrt |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Apr |
1885 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Campbell Kenneth |
M |
|
Head |
M |
|
1835 |
66
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Campbell Sarah |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
|
1855 |
46
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Campbell J Mary |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 30 |
1866 |
35
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Campbell John |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 10 |
1868 |
32
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Campbell A Jessie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 16 |
1875 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Campbell Christina |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 5 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Campbell Lucy |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 30 |
1880 |
20
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Campbell Aniebella |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 23 |
1883 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Campbell Colin |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 23 |
1883 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Gunn Sidney |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
|
1859 |
42
|
|
|
01 |
|
31 |
Grant J William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Oct 5 |
1871 |
30
|
|
|
01 |
|
31 |
Grant Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 5 |
1871 |
30
|
|
|
01 |
|
31 |
Grant Balla |
F |
|
Mother |
W |
|
1849 |
50
|
|
|
01 |
|
31 |
Grant Y? Donald |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 2 |
1897 |
4
|
|
|
01 |
|
31 |
Grant Archie |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 9 |
1898 |
3
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Grant Annie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 8 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
01 |
|
31 |
Grant Isabella |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 13 |
1901 |
|
01 |
|
31 |
Kelley T Robert |
M |
|
Lodger |
S |
Sep 17 |
1888 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
McAuly Murdoch |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Aug 5 |
1848 |
52
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
McAuly Catherin |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec |
1847 |
53
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
McAuly Murdoch |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Nov 13 |
1880 |
21
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
McAuly C Cathrine |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 20 |
1876 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
McAuly Isabella |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 13 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
McAuly John |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 8 |
1882 |
19
|
|
|
|
Line Notes On This Page
The following note applies to line 5:
The following note applies to line 9:
'Possibly should be "daughter"? (going by first name Elsie)' |
The following note applies to line 10:
'Possibly should be "daughter"? based on first name Tessie' |
The following note applies to line 21:
'Possibly should be married son of head?' |
The following note applies to line 22:
'Possibly should be daughter in law of head?' |
The following note applies to line 23:
'Should be grandson of head?' |
The following note applies to line 24:
'Should be granddaughter of head?' |
The following note applies to line 25:
'Should be grandson of head?' |
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
19 |
|
29 |
Grant | James |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Nov 10 |
1830 |
70 |
On line 19,
the value for the household
field is "29",
the suggested correction is "1029".
The following comment was attached: 1000 added to household number to render it unique
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
20 |
|
29 |
Grant | A Jane |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 18 |
1836 |
64 |
On line 20,
the value for the household
field is "29",
the suggested correction is "1029".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
23 |
|
29 |
Grant | A William |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Nov 19 |
1894 |
7 |
On line 23,
the value for the age
field is "7",
the suggested correction is "6". Submitted by Karen King.
The following comment was attached: Age at time of census should be 6 not 7
|
This correction was evaluated by Tracey Sheady:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
This comment was added: Transcriptions are based on originals, so even if age is incorrect, it must be transcribed as written by enumerator.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
42 |
|
31 |
Grant | Annie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 8 |
1899 |
2 |
On line 42,
the value for the age
field is "2",
the suggested correction is "1". Submitted by Karen King.
The following comment was attached: Age at time of census should be 1 not 2
|
This correction was evaluated by Tracey Sheady:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
This comment was added: Probably should be age '1', but clearly shows '2'
|
|
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: e-4
District: CORNWALL & STORMONT
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com