Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
|
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 85 | Flemming David | M | Son | S | Feb 18 | 1861 |
|
|||||
2 | 86 | Porter John | M | Head | M | Feb 2 | 1844 |
|
|||||
3 | 86 | Porter Jessie | F | Wife | M | Jul 19 | 1845 |
|
01 | ||||
4 | 86 | Porter Minnie | F | Daughter | S | Jan 10 | 1875 |
|
01 | ||||
5 | 86 | Porter Amy | F | Daughter | S | Feb 25 | 1878 |
|
|||||
6 | 86 | Porter Alice | F | Daughter | S | Feb 11 | 1880 |
|
01 | ||||
7 | 86 | Porter William | M | Son | S | Mar 28 | 1882 |
|
|||||
8 | 86 | Porter John | M | Son | S | Aug | 27 |
|
01 | ||||
9 | 87 | Heaslip Andrew | M | Head | W | Jul 20 | 1859 |
|
|||||
10 | 87 | Heaslip David | M | Brother | S | Feb 15 | 1866 |
|
|||||
11 | 87 | Heaslip Elizabeth | F | Daughter | S | Jan 13 | 1889 |
|
|||||
12 | 87 | Heaslip William A. | M | Son | S | 1891 |
|
||||||
13 | 88 | Thompson George | M | Head | S | Mar 23 | 1851 |
|
01 | ||||
14 | 88 | King Sarah A. | F | Sister | W | May 6 | 1855 |
|
01* | ||||
15 | 88 | King William | M | Nephew | S | Feb 16 | 1884 |
|
|||||
16 | 88 | King Jane | F | Niece | S | Feb 16 | 1884 |
|
|||||
17 | 88 | King Gertrude | F | Niece | S | Nov 18 | 1885 |
|
|||||
18 | 88 | King Violet | F | Niece | S | Sep 18 | 1887 |
|
01 | ||||
19 | 88 | King Francis N. | M | Niece | S | Jun 8 | 1890 |
|
01 | ||||
20 | 88 | King Samuel | M | Nephew | S | Jun 29 | 1892 |
|
01 | ||||
21 | 89 | Moore John | M | Head | M | Apr 23 | 1851 |
|
|||||
22 | 89 | Moore Catherine | F | Wife | M | Apr 21 | 1853 |
|
|||||
23 | 89 | Star Elizabeth | F | Ad. Daughter | S | Feb 28 | 1881 |
|
|||||
24 |
|
||||||||||||
25 |
|
||||||||||||
26 |
|
||||||||||||
27 |
|
||||||||||||
28 |
|
||||||||||||
29 |
|
||||||||||||
30 |
|
||||||||||||
31 |
|
||||||||||||
32 |
|
||||||||||||
33 |
|
||||||||||||
34 |
|
||||||||||||
35 |
|
||||||||||||
36 |
|
||||||||||||
37 |
|
||||||||||||
38 |
|
||||||||||||
39 |
|
||||||||||||
40 |
|
||||||||||||
41 |
|
||||||||||||
42 |
|
||||||||||||
43 |
|
||||||||||||
44 |
|
||||||||||||
45 |
|
||||||||||||
46 |
|
||||||||||||
47 |
|
||||||||||||
48 |
|
||||||||||||
49 |
|
||||||||||||
50 |
|
The following note applies to line 19:
'Believe this should be nephew but is indicated as niece.' |
In household 87, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Heaslip', a suggested alternative surname is 'Heslip'.
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
8 | 86 | Porter | John | M | Son | S | Aug | 27 | 1884 | ||
On line 8, the value for the year field is "27", the suggested correction is "1884". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
8 | 86 | Porter | John | M | Son | S | Aug | 27 | 1884 | ||
On line 8, the value for the age field is "1884", the suggested correction is "16". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
8 | 86 | Porter | John | M | Son | S | Aug | 27 | 1884 | ||
On line 8, the value for the day field is "0", the suggested correction is "27". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
19 | 88 | King | Francis N. | M | Niece | S | Jun 8 | 1890 | 10 | ||
On line 19,
the value for the givens
field is "Francis N.",
the suggested correction is "Frances M.". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Sandra Millis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
19 | 88 | King | Francis N. | M | Niece | S | Jun 8 | 1890 | 10 | ||
On line 19,
the value for the sex
field is "M",
the suggested correction is "F". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Sandra Millis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: This person may have been a female but the record definitely indicates "M" for sex. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
19 | 88 | King | Francis N. | M | Niece | S | Jun 8 | 1890 | 10 | ||
On line 19,
the value for the givens
field is "Francis N.",
the suggested correction is "Frances M.". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Sandra Millis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: i-4 District: PETERBOROUGH (East/Est) National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com