1911 Census of Canada |
Line notes on this page:
Line 1: St. Joseph`s Convent, R.C. Religious Order for part of the page (note added by: Shaaron Grogan-Sheahan)
Line 18: St. Joseph`s Convent boarders (students) begin here. (note added by: Shaaron Grogan-Sheahan)
Suggested corrections on this page:
Line # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Links | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 174 | Sister | St. Mary | F | Sister | S | 1884 | 26 | (corrected values) | ||||
1 | 174 | Mary St. | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1884 | 26 | (current values) | ||||
2 | 174 | Sister | Ofra | F | Sister | S | 1844 | 66 | (corrected values) | ||||
2 | 174 | Ofra | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1844 | 66 | (current values) | ||||
3 | 174 | Abrosia | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1855 | 55 | (corrected values) | ||||
3 | 174 | Abrosia | Sister | F | Sister | S | ? | 55 | (current values) | ||||
3 | 174 | Sister | Abrosia | F | Sister | S | 1855 | 55 | (corrected values) | ||||
3 | 174 | Abrosia | Sister | F | Sister | S | ? | 55 | (current values) | ||||
4 | 174 | Sister | Rosalia | F | Sister | S | 1860 | 51 | (corrected values) | ||||
4 | 174 | Rosalia | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1860 | 51 | (current values) | ||||
5 | 174 | Sister | Pius | F | Sister | S | 1853 | 58 | (corrected values) | ||||
5 | 174 | Pius | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1853 | 58 | (current values) | ||||
6 | 174 | Belrain | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1858 | 53 | (corrected values) | ||||
6 | 174 | Belr??? | Sister | F | Sister | S | ? | 53 | (current values) | ||||
Staring at the third number - the darker more solid portion contains shape similar to [5] directly under it. Personally - I would go with 1853. U to you. (note added by: Aileen Sloane) | |||||||||||||
Staring at the third number - the darker more solid portion contains outline so similar to [5] directly under it. Enough so that I feel certain Year is 1858. (note added by: Aileen Sloane) | |||||||||||||
6 | 174 | Sister | Belrain | F | Sister | S | 1858 | 53 | (corrected values) | ||||
6 | 174 | Belr??? | Sister | F | Sister | S | ? | 53 | (current values) | ||||
7 | 174 | Sister | Florence | F | Sister | S | 1863 | 48 | (corrected values) | ||||
7 | 174 | Florence | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1863 | 48 | (current values) | ||||
8 | 174 | Sister | St. Peter | F | Sister | S | 1862 | 49 | (corrected values) | ||||
8 | 174 | Peter St. | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1862 | 49 | (current values) | ||||
9 | 174 | Clementina | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1861 | 50 | (corrected values) | ||||
9 | 174 | Clement??? | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1861 | 50 | (current values) | ||||
9 | 174 | Sister | Clementina | F | Sister | S | 1861 | 50 | (corrected values) | ||||
9 | 174 | Clement??? | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1861 | 50 | (current values) | ||||
10 | 174 | Sister | Joachim | F | Sister | S | 1868 | 46 | (corrected values) | ||||
10 | 174 | Joachim | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1868 | 46 | (current values) | ||||
11 | 174 | Sister | Dominic | F | Sister | S | 1865 | 46 | (corrected values) | ||||
11 | 174 | Dominic | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1865 | 46 | (current values) | ||||
12 | 174 | Sister | Paula | F | Sister | S | 1876 | 35 | (corrected values) | ||||
12 | 174 | Paula | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1876 | 35 | (current values) | ||||
13 | 174 | Sister | Amicatus | F | Sister | S | 1876 | 35 | (corrected values) | ||||
13 | 174 | Amicatus | Sister | F | Sister | S | 1878 | 35 | (current values) | ||||
18 | 174 | Burns | Teresa | F | Boarder | S | Aug | 1894 | 16 | (corrected values) | |||
18 | 174 | Burns | Teresa | F | Boarder | S | Aug | ? | 16 | (current values) | |||
The over-writing really messes it up, but magnified, I can see the [4]. (note added by: Aileen Sloane) | |||||||||||||
18 | 174 | Burns | Teresa | F | Boarder | S | Aug | 1894 | 16 | (corrected values) | |||
18 | 174 | Burns | Teresa | F | Boarder | S | Aug | ? | 16 | (current values) | |||
21 | 174 | Eckhart | Elizabeth | F | Boarder | S | Nov | 1894 | 16 | (corrected values) | |||
21 | 174 | Eckhart | Elizabeth | F | Boarder | S | Jun | 1893 | 17 | (current values) | |||
23 | 174 | Tseelinge(?) | Rhea | F | Boarder | S | May | 1891 | 19 | (corrected values) | |||
23 | 174 | Geetings | Rhea | F | Boarder | S | May | 1891 | 19 | (current values) | |||
Phonics? (note added by: Aileen Sloane) | |||||||||||||
24 | 174 | McLeister | Nellie | F | Boarder | S | Aug | 1891 | 19 | (corrected values) | |||
24 | 174 | McLeistor | Nellie | F | Boarder | S | Aug | 1891 | 19 | (current values) | |||
25 | 174 | McGregor | Alice | F | Boarder | S | Sep | 1894 | 16 | (corrected values) | |||
25 | 174 | McGregor | Alice | F | Boarder | S | Sep | 1884 | 16 | (current values) | |||
31 | 174 | Frawley | Irene | F | Boarder | S | Aug | 1892 | 18 | (corrected values) | |||
31 | 174 | Fraisley | Irene | F | Boarder | S | Aug | 1892 | 18 | (current values) | |||
34 | 174 | Mayo | Celicia | F | Boarder | S | Feb | 1898 | 13 | (corrected values) | |||
34 | 174 | Ma?o | Celicia | F | Brother | S | Feb | 1898 | 13 | (current values) | |||
34 | 174 | Mayo | Celicia | F | Brother | S | Feb | 1898 | 13 | (corrected values) | |||
34 | 174 | Ma?o | Celicia | F | Brother | S | Feb | 1898 | 13 | (current values) | |||
36 | 174 | Secord | Marie | F | Boarder | S | Jul | 1892 | 18 | (corrected values) | |||
36 | 174 | Serand | Marie | F | Boarder | S | Jul | 1892 | 18 | (current values) | |||
37 | 174 | Braine | Mae | F | Boarder | S | Apr | 1893 | 18 | (corrected values) | |||
37 | 174 | Bra?ne | Mae | F | Boarder | S | Apr | 1893 | 18 | (current values) | |||
37 | 174 | Browne | Mae | F | Boarder | S | Apr | 1893 | 18 | (corrected values) | |||
37 | 174 | Bra?ne | Mae | F | Boarder | S | Apr | 1893 | 18 | (current values) | |||
40 | 174 | Kennedy | Lithan | F | Boarder | S | May | 1892 | 19 | (corrected values) | |||
40 | 174 | Kennedy | Lith?n | F | Boarder | S | May | 1892 | 19 | (current values) | |||
Ignore the leeding plus that horizontal mark is not part of any letter. The "i" is the stroke coming off the 2nd. "l". (note added by: Aileen Sloane) | |||||||||||||
40 | 174 | Kennedy | Lillian | F | Boarder | S | May | 1892 | 19 | (corrected values) | |||
40 | 174 | Kennedy | Lith?n | F | Boarder | S | May | 1892 | 19 | (current values) | |||
43 | 174 | Langen | Cecilia | F | Boarder | S | Jul | 1891 | 19 | (corrected values) | |||
43 | 174 | Lampan | Cecilia | F | Boarder | S | Jul | 1891 | 19 | (current values) | |||
Someone over-wrote this one. I believe they erred. I think I see an "o" under the "e". Also think there is a "d" missing, but can`t do anything about it. Name may be Langdon. (note added by: Aileen Sloane) | |||||||||||||
44 | 174 | Legandre | Coronna | F | Boarder | S | Apr | 1896 | 15 | (corrected values) | |||
44 | 174 | Legandra | Coronna | F | Boarder | S | Apr | 1896 | 15 | (current values) | |||
This girl was French. (note added by: Aileen Sloane) | |||||||||||||
50 | 174 | Rathaill | Loretto | F | Boarder | S | Dec | 1894 | 16 | (corrected values) | |||
50 | 174 | Rath?ill | Loretto | F | Boarder | S | Dec | 1894 | 16 | (current values) | |||
This family is familiar to me. I`m sure their name was spelt Rathwell but enumerator entered "i". (note added by: Aileen Sloane) | |||||||||||||
50 | 174 | Rathwill | Loretto | F | Boarder | S | Dec | 1894 | 16 | (corrected values) | |||
50 | 174 | Rath?ill | Loretto | F | Boarder | S | Dec | 1894 | 16 | (current values) | |||
50 | 174 | Rathwill | Loretta | F | Boarder | S | Dec | 1894 | 16 | (corrected values) | |||
50 | 174 | Rath?ill | Loretto | F | Boarder | S | Dec | 1894 | 16 | (current values) |